A quick note for U.S. customers: Components4Developers is a Danish company, and the software is developed in Denmark by a programmer with strong opinions about the current U.S. president and his actions.
If that concerns you, you may prefer to shop elsewhere.
Since I’m in the US, I don’t really have a feel for what the citizens of Denmark are feeling about Trump’s expressed interest in Greenland. However, if you think that the operation in Venezuela has any relation, correlation, or comparison to Trump’s interest in Greenland, I think you would be quite mistaken.
As I understand it (correct me if I’m wrong!), Trump’s interest in Greenland has everything to do with defense of the North American and – to a lesser extent – West European continent(s) and nations (our allies) from Russian aggression.
Trump doesn’t always get it right, but the strategic importance of the island of Greenland as a buffer to Russian aggression cannot be overstated. How the US and West European nations work out the defense of the regions in the vicinity of Greenland is and should be open for discussion and debate. The strategic, geographic importance of Greenland as a buffer against Russian aggression is undeniable.
One thing about Trump that needs to be taken into consideration is that if he is making brash public statements about a matter, it’s usually to draw attention to an important issue, with the intent of pushing nations that are in the process of being overrun by North African and Middle Eastern muslim immigrants to elevate their defensive posture of the region, against Russian aggression, to the highest level.
I’d be interested to hear your view on these issues!
I just heard that there was an interest in rare earth minerals in Greenland. Apparently that is no longer an issue, as the US has both internal and external resources that negate that need.
You might find this rather long program informative: https://www.youtube.com/live/yiMxuLPx4I8?si=NnnSsK01NuwJwxte
To David… seemingly I cant reply to the explicit post as it seems to have exceeded WordPress level limit or something.
IF it was about US security, then why did the US close down all but one of the bases they had on Greenland, and limit their forces from more than 10.000 to only 150?
IF it was about US security, then why do the US not simply reopen bases and post more soldiers? There is an agreement with Denmark from the 1950s which is still in effect to this day.
IF it was true that Russian and Chinese ships are swarming around Greenland, then why does no Greenlanders see any of those ships?
IF it was true that China is taking over mineral rights in Greenland, then why did the US not bid for any of the quite few mining options made available by the Greenlanders?
IF Denmark was so bad for the Greenlanders, why do the Danish send roughly US$20.000 to each Greenlander each and every year + providing free education on Universities in Denmark, free hospital treatment, and for the cases they might not be able to handle in Greenland, free on top Danish hospitals?
IF Denmark was not a good ally to the US, then WHY did Denmark loose many more soldiers in the Article 5 called invasion of Afghanistan than any other country per capita?
IF Denmark was not interested in security, then WHY did Denmark not only sign paperwork with theUS about the access to Greenland, but also purchase F35s and loads of other US military equipment since WW2?
IF Trump was so trustworthy, then WHY has he not followed up on his pre election mantras, which got him elected?
IF US citizens find it acceptable to have a lying piece of …. to lead them, and NATO’s musketeer oath is no longer trustworthy, then WHY should NATO members not consider US a threat to the alliance, and the safety of the countries within?
Go ahead, Kim, tell me how you really feel! ;-))
Seriously, thanks for sharing your perspectives. As someone who voted for DJT (twice!), I can confidently share that I’m not a huge fan, and could enumerate several things that I do.not.like about our president.
In the US, for the last *many* decades, presidential elections have been a matter of “hold your nose, and flip the lever” in the voting booth.
Which means that we have to take the good with the bad, the nice with the mean, the truth with the lie, etc. I hope you get my point.
In defense of Mr. Trump, he is the *only* president we have ever had in the last 100+ years who has not only identified the internal communist/anarchist/socialist elements that seek to eliminate the US constitutional legal system and the protections of freedom that are enshrined therein, but also seeks to turn the US away from the globalist, self-destructive, freedom killing agendas that have been pushed by the US’s “uni-party” presidents and congress for the last 100 years, going all the way back to Teddy Roosevelt.
I regret that Mr. Trump has perfected the art of “alienating friends and family”, having personality traits that so many of us detest. But for once we at least have a president that stands up for US independence internally and stands up for US interests worldwide.
Your response was rather informative, as I not only have heard almost exclusively good things about Denmark, but actually have some distant family relations that live there and love the country.
My sincere hope is that future US presidents can stand upon the positive aspects of the foundation that Mr. Trump has laid, and build upon that foundation in areas that need improvement.
Thanks for sharing your perspective, it is nothing less than enlightening!
From what I’ve seen through my interactions with U.S. citizens on various social media platforms, it often feels like many people are living in a bubble or an echo chamber, with limited awareness of what’s happening beyond their immediate world. Of course, there are plenty of exceptions—but the loudest and most visible voices, often with the biggest followings, tend to speak and behave as if the world were a sitcom or reality show.
I also notice that hostility toward others is often wrapped in a religious façade, even when it seems absolutely detached from the actual meaning of Christianity. And I say that as a baptized, de facto atheist.
In my view, there’s a significant gap in basic education in the U.S. And yes—I have strong opinions about injustice, especially when it affects me, my family, my country, or my union, directly or indirectly.
I hadn’t heard any news concerning the US interest in Greenland in so long that I thought that issue was shelved. I’m surprised to hear new statements from our president about continued interest in what, exactly, concerning Greenland and Denmark?
It just seems very strange to me that not only has Denmark been such an upstanding NATO member nation, but also such a close ally of the US, yet is being spoken of by our president in this way.
I agree with you that our common security interests should be handled in a very different, much more cooperative, respectful and mutually beneficial matter.
As for your thoughts about Russian and Chinese ships in the vicinity of Greenland, the greater threat is not about surface vessels, but rather nuclear submarines and long range bombers. Greenland is the perfect region for interdiction of the military assets of our common adversaries.
About the only encouragement that I can give you is that for all of the presidents’ bluster and careless public statements, he is surrounded by much wiser cabinet officials who are much more measured in their approach, and that Trump not only trusts his advisors, but delegates actual policy decisions to far more reasoned and competent professionals.
I respect your opinion.
I just do not agree. There have been numerous situations where his ministers and designated leaders have done stupid, immoral, and probably as far as I can understand unlawful things.
In his first period, there were people who limited his actions… much less so now.
The proof is in the pudding… the things Trump said to be elected… he is not going to fulfill. But the things he has said he would do, after he was elected, he has done to the dot, with numerous significant consequences, directly resulting in loss of lives.
I’m absolutely certain that his words about Greenland is not bluster or negotiation tactics, but actually something he wants to do. Counting on the opposite by pure faith and trust, is something no country can afford to do with a person with a trackrecord like him.
Hey Kim! A long-time, satisfied US customer… what is this little post about?
Care to elaborate?
Just a reaction to your Presidents continued threats towards my country.
Are you referring to his expressed interest in Greenland?
Yes
Since I’m in the US, I don’t really have a feel for what the citizens of Denmark are feeling about Trump’s expressed interest in Greenland. However, if you think that the operation in Venezuela has any relation, correlation, or comparison to Trump’s interest in Greenland, I think you would be quite mistaken.
As I understand it (correct me if I’m wrong!), Trump’s interest in Greenland has everything to do with defense of the North American and – to a lesser extent – West European continent(s) and nations (our allies) from Russian aggression.
Trump doesn’t always get it right, but the strategic importance of the island of Greenland as a buffer to Russian aggression cannot be overstated. How the US and West European nations work out the defense of the regions in the vicinity of Greenland is and should be open for discussion and debate. The strategic, geographic importance of Greenland as a buffer against Russian aggression is undeniable.
One thing about Trump that needs to be taken into consideration is that if he is making brash public statements about a matter, it’s usually to draw attention to an important issue, with the intent of pushing nations that are in the process of being overrun by North African and Middle Eastern muslim immigrants to elevate their defensive posture of the region, against Russian aggression, to the highest level.
I’d be interested to hear your view on these issues!
I just heard that there was an interest in rare earth minerals in Greenland. Apparently that is no longer an issue, as the US has both internal and external resources that negate that need.
You might find this rather long program informative:
https://www.youtube.com/live/yiMxuLPx4I8?si=NnnSsK01NuwJwxte
To David… seemingly I cant reply to the explicit post as it seems to have exceeded WordPress level limit or something.
IF it was about US security, then why did the US close down all but one of the bases they had on Greenland, and limit their forces from more than 10.000 to only 150?
IF it was about US security, then why do the US not simply reopen bases and post more soldiers? There is an agreement with Denmark from the 1950s which is still in effect to this day.
IF it was true that Russian and Chinese ships are swarming around Greenland, then why does no Greenlanders see any of those ships?
IF it was true that China is taking over mineral rights in Greenland, then why did the US not bid for any of the quite few mining options made available by the Greenlanders?
IF Denmark was so bad for the Greenlanders, why do the Danish send roughly US$20.000 to each Greenlander each and every year + providing free education on Universities in Denmark, free hospital treatment, and for the cases they might not be able to handle in Greenland, free on top Danish hospitals?
IF Denmark was not a good ally to the US, then WHY did Denmark loose many more soldiers in the Article 5 called invasion of Afghanistan than any other country per capita?
IF Denmark was not interested in security, then WHY did Denmark not only sign paperwork with theUS about the access to Greenland, but also purchase F35s and loads of other US military equipment since WW2?
IF Trump was so trustworthy, then WHY has he not followed up on his pre election mantras, which got him elected?
IF US citizens find it acceptable to have a lying piece of …. to lead them, and NATO’s musketeer oath is no longer trustworthy, then WHY should NATO members not consider US a threat to the alliance, and the safety of the countries within?
Go ahead, Kim, tell me how you really feel! ;-))
Seriously, thanks for sharing your perspectives. As someone who voted for DJT (twice!), I can confidently share that I’m not a huge fan, and could enumerate several things that I do.not.like about our president.
In the US, for the last *many* decades, presidential elections have been a matter of “hold your nose, and flip the lever” in the voting booth.
Which means that we have to take the good with the bad, the nice with the mean, the truth with the lie, etc. I hope you get my point.
In defense of Mr. Trump, he is the *only* president we have ever had in the last 100+ years who has not only identified the internal communist/anarchist/socialist elements that seek to eliminate the US constitutional legal system and the protections of freedom that are enshrined therein, but also seeks to turn the US away from the globalist, self-destructive, freedom killing agendas that have been pushed by the US’s “uni-party” presidents and congress for the last 100 years, going all the way back to Teddy Roosevelt.
I regret that Mr. Trump has perfected the art of “alienating friends and family”, having personality traits that so many of us detest. But for once we at least have a president that stands up for US independence internally and stands up for US interests worldwide.
Your response was rather informative, as I not only have heard almost exclusively good things about Denmark, but actually have some distant family relations that live there and love the country.
My sincere hope is that future US presidents can stand upon the positive aspects of the foundation that Mr. Trump has laid, and build upon that foundation in areas that need improvement.
Thanks for sharing your perspective, it is nothing less than enlightening!
From what I’ve seen through my interactions with U.S. citizens on various social media platforms, it often feels like many people are living in a bubble or an echo chamber, with limited awareness of what’s happening beyond their immediate world. Of course, there are plenty of exceptions—but the loudest and most visible voices, often with the biggest followings, tend to speak and behave as if the world were a sitcom or reality show.
I also notice that hostility toward others is often wrapped in a religious façade, even when it seems absolutely detached from the actual meaning of Christianity. And I say that as a baptized, de facto atheist.
In my view, there’s a significant gap in basic education in the U.S. And yes—I have strong opinions about injustice, especially when it affects me, my family, my country, or my union, directly or indirectly.
I hadn’t heard any news concerning the US interest in Greenland in so long that I thought that issue was shelved. I’m surprised to hear new statements from our president about continued interest in what, exactly, concerning Greenland and Denmark?
It just seems very strange to me that not only has Denmark been such an upstanding NATO member nation, but also such a close ally of the US, yet is being spoken of by our president in this way.
I agree with you that our common security interests should be handled in a very different, much more cooperative, respectful and mutually beneficial matter.
As for your thoughts about Russian and Chinese ships in the vicinity of Greenland, the greater threat is not about surface vessels, but rather nuclear submarines and long range bombers. Greenland is the perfect region for interdiction of the military assets of our common adversaries.
About the only encouragement that I can give you is that for all of the presidents’ bluster and careless public statements, he is surrounded by much wiser cabinet officials who are much more measured in their approach, and that Trump not only trusts his advisors, but delegates actual policy decisions to far more reasoned and competent professionals.
I respect your opinion.
I just do not agree. There have been numerous situations where his ministers and designated leaders have done stupid, immoral, and probably as far as I can understand unlawful things.
In his first period, there were people who limited his actions… much less so now.
The proof is in the pudding… the things Trump said to be elected… he is not going to fulfill. But the things he has said he would do, after he was elected, he has done to the dot, with numerous significant consequences, directly resulting in loss of lives.
I’m absolutely certain that his words about Greenland is not bluster or negotiation tactics, but actually something he wants to do. Counting on the opposite by pure faith and trust, is something no country can afford to do with a person with a trackrecord like him.